Ingrowth Viral Grow India Pvt Ltd

← All client stories D2C Growth

Meta Ads D2C Lingerie Creative Testing Scaling

How We Scaled Effectinn Lingerie to ₹15 Lakhs in Revenue at 3X ROAS

Scale spend without giving up efficiency. The account started around 2.12X ROAS. Product-led creative testing and controlled budget increases pushed short-term performance to about 3.8X and helped sustain roughly 3X at higher spend.
2.12X
Approx. starting ROAS in the first 18 days of July
3.79X
Late-July account snapshot after scaling
₹5.05L
Verified Meta Ads spend in August
3.00X
Average purchase ROAS in August

At a glance

Client
Effectinn Lingerie
Category
Women's lingerie · D2C fashion
Market
India
Engagement
Meta Ads optimization, creative testing and controlled scaling
Starting point
Existing campaigns at approximately 2.12X ROAS with inconsistent performance
Scaling goal
Increase spend while maintaining approximately 3X ROAS
01 · The problem

Existing Meta Ads were running, but the account lacked a repeatable scaling system

Effectinn Lingerie is a women's lingerie brand focused on comfort, style, quality and affordability. Its range includes everyday bras, full-coverage styles, lace lingerie and supportive designs for customers who want comfort without compromising on style.

When Viral Groww entered the account, Meta Ads were already active, but performance was inconsistent. During the first 18 days of July, the existing campaigns were generating approximately 2.12X ROAS. The client wanted to increase ad spend while keeping approximately 3X ROAS as the minimum benchmark.

Before scaling

  • Inconsistent Meta Ads performance
  • Approximately 2.12X ROAS in the first 18 days of July
  • No clear repeatable process for scaling winning products
  • Higher spend risked reducing efficiency

The objective

  • Identify the products with the strongest sales potential
  • Find creatives capable of performing consistently
  • Increase ad spend without sacrificing ROAS
  • Build a structure that could scale beyond the existing ceiling
02 · The method

We narrowed the account to products and creatives that had a reason to scale

Instead of trying to scale every product and every ad at once, we started by identifying the brand's top-selling products. The strongest categories included lace bras, tummy cup bras and FCD / full-coverage bras.

01

Start with top-selling products

We prioritized products that were already showing stronger customer demand instead of distributing budget evenly across the catalogue.

02

Develop and test multiple video creatives

Multiple video creatives were tested around the selected products so the account could identify which combinations of product, message and execution were capable of generating purchases consistently.

03

Move winners into scaling campaigns

Once testing produced clear winners, the strongest-performing creatives were moved into scaling campaigns and budgets were increased gradually behind them.

The strategy was not “spend more and hope.” It was identify demand, validate creative performance, then give more budget to what purchase data was already supporting.

03 · The results

ROAS improved as spend increased, then held around 3X at a much larger monthly budget

The impact became visible quickly. After starting from approximately 2.12X ROAS, the account moved to roughly ₹40,000 in spend at 3.7X ROAS. In the following week, spend increased to approximately ₹61,000 while ROAS improved further to about 3.8X.

₹40K → 3.7X
Early improvement after the new strategy was introduced
₹61K → 3.79X
Late-July account snapshot while spend increased
₹5.05L → 3.00X
August spend and average purchase ROAS
Evidence · Late July performance
Meta Ads campaign performance for Effectinn Lingerie showing ₹61,265.62 total spend and 3.79 average purchase ROAS
Late-July proof: the visible account snapshot shows total spend of ₹61,265.62 with an average purchase ROAS of 3.79. Several active campaigns in the same view also show individual ROAS above 4X.

The key win was not only a higher ROAS

A common Meta Ads problem is that ROAS falls as budgets rise. Here, the account initially moved in the opposite direction: spend increased while winning creatives continued performing, taking ROAS from approximately 2.12X to 3.7X and then about 3.8X.

That gave the team a repeatable process for identifying winning products and creatives before allocating more budget.

Evidence · August scale
Effectinn Lingerie August Meta Ads campaign view showing ₹505,029.93 total spend and 3.00 average purchase ROAS
August scale: the account view shows ₹505,029.93 in total Meta Ads spend for August at an average purchase ROAS of 3.00, matching the client's approximate 3X benchmark while operating at a much higher spend level.

Maintaining approximately 3X while scaling

The next challenge was not creating one strong week. It was maintaining performance as the account moved to a much higher spend level.

The monthly reporting view shows ₹505,029.93 spend at 3.00X ROAS in August. For September 1–15, the same report shows ₹360,768.13 spend at 3.06X ROAS. That supports the core result: the account continued operating around the client's 3X benchmark after the initial jump in performance.

Evidence · Monthly trend
Meta Ads monthly report for Effectinn Lingerie showing August spend of ₹505,029.93 at 3.00 ROAS and September 1 to 15 spend of ₹360,768.13 at 3.06 ROAS
Monthly trend: August closed at ₹505,029.93 spend and 3.00X ROAS. September 1–15 shows ₹360,768.13 spend and 3.06X ROAS in the visible report.

Data note: the screenshots use different reporting windows. Late-July, August and September figures are presented separately so they are not combined into one unsupported claim.

04 · Takeaways

What made the scaling process sustainable

The 4 moves behind the growth system:

01

Scale products with proven demand.

Top-selling products gave the testing process a stronger starting point than trying to push the entire catalogue equally.

02

Creative testing came before aggressive scaling.

Multiple video creatives helped identify which messages and executions deserved more budget.

03

Budget increases were controlled.

Winners were moved into scaling campaigns and budgets were increased progressively instead of forcing spend into unproven ads.

04

The benchmark stayed visible.

The client wanted approximately 3X ROAS, so scaling decisions had to protect that efficiency target as spend increased.

Sustainable growth

Higher spend mattered only because the account could keep its efficiency benchmark

The biggest takeaway from Effectinn Lingerie's campaign was not simply reaching about 3.8X ROAS. It was the ability to improve efficiency while increasing spend, then keep the account operating around 3X ROAS as budgets moved much higher.

The process started with an account generating approximately 2.12X ROAS, identified the brand's strongest products, tested multiple video creatives, found the winners and gradually scaled those winners using real campaign data.

Sustainable Meta Ads scaling is not simply spending more. It is knowing what to scale, when to scale it and which creatives have earned more budget.